Author: Jasper Berg, J.D.

  • Can You Get Unemployment on MLK Day?

    MLK day is difficult for unemployed workers.  Figuring out how to manage benefits on this day is equally difficult.  Thus, here are a few quick points on Minnesota benefits:

    • Yes, applicants should be able to request benefits online; and
    • Contacting DEED’s customer service department will be impossible.

    Unemployment on MLK Day: Online Account

    Yes, applicants should be able to request benefits online.  As you know, applicants are limited to strange time limits. I do not have an answer for you on why DEED’s account system is available on Sundays and not Saturdays.

    That said, take their application questions seriously.

    Unemployment Support by Phone

    No, applicants wishing to connect with an unemployment representative by phone will not be able to talk with somebody until Tuesday. Because Minnesota DEED makes mistakes, consider using this time researching and exploring matters on your own behalf.

    Appealing Unemployment on MLK Day

    Folks looking to appeal unemployment benefits are encouraged to approach any holiday with critical care. Holidays impact unemployment deadlines. And, deadlines can be very unforgiving.

    On the other hand, sending an appeal by fax might be a strong alternative. The best rule when confronting an unemployment deadline is verify, track, and perfect the appeal under multiple forms (fax, online, mail, etc.).

    Unemployment on MLK Day:  What To Do?

    Use the day to your advantage. First, celebrate the holiday. Second, continue planning your job search. Third, use the day to research matters related to your claim.

    Even though unemployment on MLK Day causes confusion, the goal of seeking work or being available for work is still relevant.

  • My Unemployment Base Period in MN was Wrong

    My Unemployment Base Period in MN was Wrong

    What is your unemployment Base Period in MN and what does it mean?

    An Unemployment Base Period is used to calculate how much in benefits a person will receive on a weekly basis.

    Basically, DEED (the unemployment office in Minnesota) reviews the last four completed calendar quarters of wages.  The more money a person made in the last 4 quarters, the more in benefits a person will be eligible for.

    Because the statute is so darn complicated, DEED gets these types of calculations wrong.  Also, employers fail at reporting wages and indirectly cause problems for applicants seeking benefits.

    Thus, appealing an unemployment base period error can be worth it.

    Unemployment Base Period:  Pinpoint Reasons

    In my practice, I see employees focus way to much time on their base period when instead, they should focus on their appeal for eligibility.

    Other times, I see people overwhelmed with appeal issues and completely forget about the wages impacting their benefits.

    So you know, an Unemployment Base Period in MN can change for a number of reasons.  Some of the most common reasons include commission schedules, injuries, and leaves of absences.

    Calculate Your Base Period

    In Minnesota, here is the most common method for determining a base period.

    • If you become unemployed between February 1 and March 31, the Unemployment Base Period is January 1 through December 31 
    • (of the previous year).
    • If you become unemployed between May 1 and June 30, the base period is April 1 through March 31.
    • If you become unemployed between August 1 and September 30, the Unemployment Base Period in MN is July 1 through June 30.
    • If you become unemployed between November 1 and December 31, the Unemployment Base Period in MN is October 1 through September 30.

    UI Base Period Final Thoughts

    As you can see, this issue is extremely tricky and bares certain risks that may inadvertently initiate an audit or instigate an appeal.

    Again, check out Minnesota statute 268.035 and be very prudent with the exchange of paperwork or evidence, because DEED and employers make mistakes.

    I wish you the very best.

  • Job Offers Cause Unemployment Problems

    Job Offers Cause Unemployment Problems

    Unsuitable job offers can hurt unemployed workers in Minnesota.  Money, salary, and wages make a job offer prone to an audit.

    When employers and temp agencies hide the details of an offer, this makes reviewing suitable offers versus the unemployment rule, job seekers get stuck.

    Thus, let’s take a quick look at this issue.

    Unemployment Lawyer

    Unemployment Help

    If you have ever watched Wall Street pundits or hung around a pig farmer, you likely have heard the phrase pigs get fed, hogs get slaughtered.  

    Applying this saying to an unemployed worker, it might appear they should jump at the first job offer.  But, what if the job offer is ridiculously low?

    Well, a lot of folks end up seeking advisement on rule 268.085, subdivision 13c, which is actually quite long. Basically, it says a worker is ineligible for benefits if they reject a reasonable “suitable employment” offer for work.

    As you can probably guess, what is suitable or reasonable for some, might not be suitable or reasonable for others.  In no particular order, here are a few factors to consider:

    • How long has one been unemployed
    • The size of one’s labor market
    • Commute length
    • Shift work
    • Previous jobs or careers
    • Past wages, salary, commissions, etc.
    • Difference in pay compared to job history
    • Occupation
    • Contract terms

    Again, this is a very subjective list and it will be different for nearly everybody.

    Absolutely I believe the process of being unemployed can turn into an even better opportunity for executives, managers, union workers, hourly workers, part-time workers, and everybody in-between.  

    But, hogs have a tendency of getting slaughtered, when waiting for pie-in-the-sky job offers.

    For some, the risks and penalties identified by case law and Minnesota unemployment statute 268.085 outweigh the rewards.  

    Again, this is a case by case situation because it requires a deep understanding of unemployment misrepresentation versus a business risk.

    From my perspective, I want to help folks remain eligible.  Being ineligible or taxed with an overpayment makes being unemployed even more difficult than it already is.  

    Here are a few more issues every applicant should be prepared for:

    • Engaging the reason(s) for becoming unemployed.

    In my profession, I see small problems turn into big problems because people respond horribly to questionnaires and judges.  Thus, please be prudent and versus rolling the dice.

  • Unemployment Misrepresentation Is Looking Different

    Unemployment Misrepresentation Is Looking Different

    Unemployment misrepresentation is the new unemployment fraud.  If you are new to either of these phrases, let me explain.

    Prior to the year 2017, the unemployment office made a distinction between fraud and non fraud overpayments.  As of the date of this post, the unemployment office (or DEED) is now using the phrase “misrepresentation” to impose scare tactics and crazy monetary penalties.

    Luckily, people are seeking help to identify how they should proceed with an overpayment, audit, or accused of unemployment misrepresentation.

    New Law for Unemployment Misrepresentation

    Really, the law is edited versus new.  Minnesota’s unemployment office has been using the rules to attach ridiculous penalties for a long time.  Here is what Minnesota statute 268.18 says right now:

    An applicant has committed misrepresentation if the applicant is overpaid unemployment benefits by making a false statement or representation without a good faith belief as to the correctness of the statement or representation

    In my experience, I found the 2016 law more advantageous for Applicants.  Really, the issue for the majority of people impacted by this law will be figuring out when a decision (whether from DEED or an unemployment law judge) became final.

    For some, the old rule still applies.  For many others, the new law will be more impactful.  Thus, it is worth the effort to have a case reviewed.

    Unemployment Misrepresentation Penalties

    For those who have dealt with unemployment misrepresentation or fraud before, one can quickly see that Minnesota still charges a 40% penalty.  In other words, if DEED claims a person was overpaid $100 dollars in benefits, they will be charged $140 dollars.

    To make matters even worse, Applicants are at risk of criminal penalties, administrative penalties, additional interest, and levies.

    I agree their 40% penalty is unfair and it might even breach usury laws outlined in the Christian Bible.  But, focusing one’s time on finding a way to remove the misrepresentation claim is going to be more productive.

    Where Do Most Misrepresentation Cases Start?

    There isn’t one specific area.  But, a lot of unemployment misrepresentation claims start from an audit or overpayment case.  Usually, these types of issues being with a questionnaire.

    Unfortunately, everybody is at risk of being audited.  Here are a few popular issues:

    Proving Unemployment Misrepresentation

    When an applicant or worker is unprepared, the State of Minnesota has the upper hand.  Luckily, if an Applicant understands what they are trying to accomplish, I believe a lot of people can turn a bad outcome into a good outcome.

    For those willing to take the time, literally, every detail needs to be explored.  This means scrutinizing why a job ended, the application for benefits process, and each week of benefits sought.

    For those needing help, please contact me directly.

  • For People Scared of a MN Unemployment Appeal [Updated]

    For People Scared of a MN Unemployment Appeal [Updated]

    Applicants who fear the MN Unemployment Appeal process are usually scared for three reasons:

    • They have never done this before,
    • Afraid of getting in trouble, or
    • Making ends meet.

    Even if all three apply to your specific situation, I believe taking this process in steps is the best process.  For the jobless, a phone call could happen any minute.  For people who are scared, let us start from the beginning.  And, for those experiencing an economic hardship, stay positive.

    That aside, unemployment benefits in Minnesota is a maze.  You have enough experience to know that most mazes can be solved by starting at the end and working backward.  Thus, lets quickly review five potential ends and see where it takes us.

    MN Unemployment Appeal – Level 0:  Application

    The first level is the application process.  Everybody starts here.  Unfortunately, a lot of people can mess this up before their claim gets going.

    Also, I believe it is a bad idea to ask the unemployment office for help.  I know they mean well, but it isn’t an accident that their mistakes turn into my cases.

    Because all benefits start with an application, I call this Level 0.

    MN Unemployment Appeal – Level I:  Phone Appeal

    When an application gets denied or an employer claims benefits should not be awarded, a Level 1 appeal is the second step.  Upon appealing a denied application, a meeting is set up such that people can talk to an unemployment law judge.

    Even though this type of appeal is conducted by phone, do not let this fool you.  The Level I Phone Appeal is the most critical level because it impacts every level going forward.

    Why is this true?  Well, the more levels you work through, the more difficult it becomes for people to use evidence or testimony to your advantage.  Also, if you do not raise a specific legal issue during the Level I process, it will become increasingly difficult to raise an issue down the road.

    For example, say a person is confused whether or not they should state whether they were fired from a job or quit.  Well, this is an issue that needs to be thought through so you can identify your offensive and defensive strategy.  If done incorrectly, an applicant might jeopardize their whole case.

    MN Unemployment Appeal – Level II:  Request for Reconsideration

    The losing party (applicant or employer) from a Phone Appeal can appeal their case a second time.

    The second type of MN Unemployment Appeal is called a Request for Reconsideration.

    A Level II appeal is different from a Level I appeal in the sense that it is mostly paperwork.  An MN Unemployment Appeal under Level I involves testimony.  However, a Level II appeal is limited to written communication between you and the assigned unemployment law judge.  For this reason, a Level II appeal is paperwork.

    MN Unemployment Appeal – Level III:  Minnesota Court of Appeals

    The third type of MN Unemployment Appeal is an appeal to the Minnesota Court of Appeals.  This type of appeal is not as expensive as you might think.

    Instead, it is the time that it takes for this element of the process to finish which is most surprising.

    An Employer or business is required to be represented by an attorney when heard by this Court.  On the other hand, an  Applicant can represent themselves Pro Se.

    MN Unemployment Appeal – Level IV:  Minnesota Supreme Court

    The fourth type of MN Unemployment Appeal is an appeal to the Minnesota Supreme Court.  Generally, very few cases make it to this level.  Because this law office has sought relief for unemployment claims by way of the Minnesota Supreme Court, this level should be approached with even more care than those expressed above.

    The difference between a Level III appeal and a Level IV appeal is the fact the Minnesota Supreme Court charges a court fee.  Unlike Level III, an attorney is required when seeking an MN Unemployment Appeal before the Minnesota Supreme Court.

    Where to go for help with an MN Unemployment Appeal?

    Regardless which level you need help with, remember the rules governing the MN unemployment appeal process are different depending on whether you are the Applicant or the Employer.  

    I wish you the very best.

  • 4 Estate Planning Tips For the Advent and Christmas Season

    4 Estate Planning Tips For the Advent and Christmas Season

    Advent is a special season for many Christian families.

    As you prepare for your celebration, here are four (4) quick tips you can apply to your estate plan.

    If you find these tips to be helpful during this holiday season, please share with your congregation.

    Advent Tip #4: Connect the Past with the Present

    Certainly, gathering for a celebration like Christmas is a fun event.  Your family’s legacy requires passing your knowledge and symbols onto the next generation.  For some, this includes pictures.  For others, this includes scrapbooks, heirlooms, and collections.

    Thus, connect past advent seasons with the present by adding a special ornament to your Christmas tree.

    Advent Tip #3: Recipes Are Underutilized

    A lot of people cannot wait to ask me how to pass their mother’s wedding ring onto the next generation when Grandma’s famous pie crust made more people smile.

    I agree, passing along jewelry is important.  But, it isn’t everything.  In my experience, tasting an old family recipe can have a greater impact on the family as a whole.

    Thus, during this holiday season, I challenge you to track down an old family recipe and add it to your estate plan.

    Advent Tip #2:  Share With Others

    Giving our time can mean more than making a gift of cash.  Of course, you already know this, but when we are gone, time no longer matters.

    Personally, I think sharing a percentage of our estate with a charitable group is far more advantageous than identifying a specific gift or dollar amount.  Here are a few other charitable examples.  Otherwise, every situation and person is different.

    Thus, if you are accustomed to sharing with others, then perhaps now is a good time to add a sharing clause limited to a specific percentage to an estate plan.

    Advent Tip #1:  Take Care of Yourself

    Christmas is a wonderful time to give.  But, advent is a season of preparation too.  As you prepare, consider locking down a plan for yourself too.

    Thus, if you need help with your plan, please contact me directly.

  • Back Pay: Unemployment Tip # 009

    Back Pay: Unemployment Tip # 009

    Getting back pay while unemployed seems like a great thing, right?  In Minnesota, paid back can have unintended negative consequences, specifically, as it relates to unemployment benefits.

    Unfortunately, applicants can inadvertently agree or trigger “back pay” ramifications described under Minnesota statute 268.035.

    If your job ended and you get a check, start asking questions. Never cash the check until you understand all of the ramifications.


    Unemployment Lawyer

    Unemployment Help

    Other Laws Use the Term Back Pay Too

    This term is used in dozens of other unemployment laws too. For example, the laws for wages and delayed payments under statute 268.085.

    As you can see, what is or is not backpay can become extremely confusing.

    Unemployment Tip # 009 –  Even if a worker or employee is no longer receiving unemployment benefits, the receipt of back pay can result in an appeal, audit or an overpayment

    What Do you Call the Payment?

    What to call money received after a job ends is confusing. The storyline why or how money is granted is going to be unique to that specific person.  

    The harm in calling money “back pay” is the impact it will have on past and future unemployment benefits. Applicants who cash a check without considering the terms can get burned.

    For example, the terms attached to a settlement agreements, worker compensation payout, or gift can be revised, such that the documents do not trigger future problems. This means taking the negotiation process seriously.

    You Need the Money Really Bad

    Every worker should be thrilled with the opportunity of acquiring additional money from their former employer.  That isn’t the issue. Instead, the issue is what to call the money received.  

    When an employer or Minnesota DEED call the money back pay, problems can ensue.  In other words, preventing an overpayment or arguing why the receipt of money didn’t trigger back pay laws is worth exploring.

  • Can A Veteran’s Spouse Live At My VA Nursing Home Too?

    Can A Veteran’s Spouse Live At My VA Nursing Home Too?

    A Veteran’s spouse is one of the most important people to have by their side.  This is especially true when a veteran enters a nursing home.  

    When the price is right, a veteran seeking a new residence at a nursing home exclusive to veterans usually want their spouse to live with them too.

    Other times, the non-veteran spouse needs assistance before the veteran.  Either way, there are eligibility rules for a Veteran’s Home under Chapter 198 and Minnesota Rules under Chapter 9050.

    Veteran’s Spouse Eligibility

    Generally speaking, here are the eligibility rules for a veteran’s spouse.  A veteran’s spouse is eligible for care through a veteran’s home when all of the following are true:

    • The military veteran must have been a resident of Minnesota BEFORE an application into a veteran’s home is sought,
    • The spouse is 55 years of age or older and a resident of Minnesota,
    • The veteran’s spouse is without adequate means of support, and
    • The spouse is unable to properly maintain for themselves.

    In my experience, a spouse and their family can do a lot of pre-planning to support this process.  Thus, if you or your family need specific feedback or assistance, please contact me directly

  • I Have No Will Because

    I Have No Will Because

    Dying  with no will makes sense for some, but does it really?  Recently, I met with a person who didn’t want a will because they couldn’t identify who should receive their stuff.  This particular person was unmarried and had no children.

    As much as I dislike the government telling me how to divide up my property, Minnesota has an estate distribution law when a person dies with no will.  The law that may apply in a situation like this Minnesota statute 524.2-103.  In my practice, I call this the “I cannot make up my mind” law.

    Yes, it is perfectly reasonable to have doubt or change one’s mind.  Other times, people lean on charity or grant their affairs to a specific organization.  If it helps, take a look at what a good-hearted individual did in Afton.

    Anyways, there is no right or wrong answer.  On the other hand, having an answer is better than having Minnesota apply the “I cannot make up my mind” law.

  • New LLC Laws in Minnesota Impact Veteran Owned Biz

    New LLC Laws in Minnesota Impact Veteran Owned Biz

    Did you hear about the new LLC laws going into effect in Minnesota?

    Veterans who own a business or have a share in a company that has a Minnesota tie should take note because the statute changes are significant for a biz that has more than one owner or officer.

    Also, Minnesota’s LLC rules and statutes are changing as of January 1, 2018.  Thus, this might become or develop into a significant issue for business owners.

    New LLC Laws: Step 1

    In this process, let me keep the first step simple.  Where can you find the laws that apply to a Limited Liability Corporation?  Thus, here you go:

    • Old MN LLC laws are here.
    • New Minnesota LLC laws are here.

    Simple, right?  In other words, the rules that help us determine what to do and how to do it are as easy as reading the laws and applying them to our business.

    New LLC Laws: Step 2

    The second step for Veterans to determine whether the statute changes impact their business is to review when their business started before or after the year 2015.  For the military vets who do not remember, consider using this website to acquire filings and reports.

    What To-Do with Minnesota’s Rule Changes?

    Luckily, most veterans have their organizational docs organized and easily accessible.  For example, documents like:

    • Articles of Incorporation,
    • Articles of Organization,
    • Annual Renewals,
    • Changes to a Registered Agent or Office,
    • Member Control Agreement,
    • Meeting Minutes,
    • Tax Identification Numbers,
    • Accounting Records, and or
    • Certain Amendments

    On the other hand, if a business owned by Minnesota Veterans have their org docs scattered amongst other documents, then getting organized becomes an immediate priority because Minnesota’s LLC laws are changing effective January 1, 2018.

    Do You Need an Attorney?

    For some businesses, yes.  For others, no.  This really isn’t about lawyering up.  This has more to do with control over compliance issues and keeping the peace amongst owners or and the company’s affairs.

    But, any Veteran willing to educate themselves on the new LLC statutes in Minnesota, I believe the outline shared by our Secretary of State (also called OSS) is an excellent resource.  Thus, check it out here.

  • Unemployment Overpayments Are Going Up

    Unemployment Overpayments Are Going Up

    Unemployment overpayments in Minnesota are no joke.  In the year 2016, Minnesota had a huge problem with overpayments to the tune of $79 million dollars. In 2025, this problem jumped to over $300 million dollars.

    Hard to believe, right?  


    Unemployment Lawyer

    Unemployment Help


    For those confronted by an overpayment appeal, time is of the essence.  If you are in need of feedback, please consider this brief outline of the unemployment appeal process.

  • Denied Unemployment for 34 Jobs

    Denied Unemployment for 34 Jobs

    Getting denied unemployment benefits calls for an appeal.  Unfortunately, there are 34 jobs that always get denied because Minnesota views them as “noncovered employment“.

    When the issue presents its self, I believe workers, employees, and executives should always argue why their job is “covered employment”. Nonetheless, here are 34 jobs that typically get denied unemployment benefits until proven otherwise:

    List of Denied Jobs for Unemployment

    This list comes from a poorly drafted Minnesota law. Luckily, Minnesota has other laws that favor awarding benefits. Nonetheless, here are a few areas that cause problems:

    (1) Employment for the United States government or an instrumentality thereof, including military service;

    (2) Employment for a state, other than Minnesota, or a political subdivision or instrumentality thereof;

    (3) Employment for a foreign government;

    (4) Employment covered under the Federal Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act;

    (5) Employment for a church or convention or association of churches, or a nonprofit organization operated primarily for religious purposes that is operated, supervised, controlled, or principally supported by a church or convention or association of churches;

    (6) Employment for an elementary or secondary school with a curriculum that includes religious education that is operated by a church, a convention or association of churches, or a nonprofit organization that is operated, supervised, controlled, or principally supported by a church or convention or association of churches;

    (7) Employment for Minnesota or a political subdivision, or a nonprofit organization, of a duly ordained or licensed minister of a church in the exercise of a ministry or by a member of a religious order in the exercise of duties required by the order;

    (8) Employment for Minnesota or a political subdivision, or a nonprofit organization, of an individual receiving rehabilitation of “sheltered” work in a facility conducted for the purpose of carrying out a program of rehabilitation for individuals whose earning capacity is impaired by age or physical or mental deficiency or injury or a program providing “sheltered” work for individuals who because of an impaired physical or mental capacity cannot be readily absorbed in the competitive labor market. This clause applies only to services performed in a facility certified by the Rehabilitation Services Branch of the department or in a day training or habilitation program licensed by the Department of Human Services;

    (9) Employment for Minnesota or a political subdivision, or a nonprofit organization, of an individual receiving work relief or work training as part of an unemployment work relief or work training program financed in whole or in part by any federal agency or an agency of a state or political subdivision thereof. This clause does not apply to programs that require unemployment benefit coverage for the participants;

    (10) Employment for Minnesota or a political subdivision, as an elected official, a member of a legislative body, or a member of the judiciary;

    (11) Employment as a member of the Minnesota National Guard or Air National Guard;

    (12) Employment for Minnesota or a political subdivision, or instrumentality thereof, of an individual serving on a temporary basis in case of fire, flood, tornado, or similar emergency;

    (13) Employment as an election official or election worker for Minnesota or a political subdivision, if the compensation for that employment was less than $1,000 in a calendar year;

    (14) Employment for Minnesota that is a major policy-making or advisory position in the unclassified service;

    (15) Employment for Minnesota in an unclassified position established under section 43A.08, subdivision 1a;

    (16) Employment for a political subdivision of Minnesota that is a nontenured major policymaking or advisory position;

    (17) Domestic employment in a private household, local college club, or local chapter of a college fraternity or sorority, if the wages paid in any calendar quarter in either the current or prior calendar year to all individuals in domestic employment totaled less than $1,000.

    (18) Employment of an individual by a son, daughter, or spouse, and employment of a child under the age of 18 by the child’s father or mother;

    (19) Employment of an inmate of a custodial or penal institution;

    (20) Employment for a school, college, or university, by a student who is enrolled and whose primary relation to the school, college, or university is as a student. This does not include an individual whose primary relation to the school, college, or university is as an employee who also takes courses;

    (21) Employment of an individual who is enrolled as a student in a full-time program at a nonprofit or public educational institution that maintains a regular faculty and curriculum and has a regularly organized body of students in attendance at the place where its educational activities are carried on, taken for credit at the institution, that combines academic instruction with work experience, if the employment is an integral part of the program, and the institution has so certified to the employer, except that this clause does not apply to employment in a program established for or on behalf of an employer or group of employers;

    (22) Employment of university, college, or professional school students in an internship or other training programs with the city of St. Paul or the city of Minneapolis under Laws 1990, chapter 570, article 6, section 3;

    (23) Employment for a hospital by a patient of the hospital. “Hospital” means an institution that has been licensed by the Department of Health as a hospital;

    (24) Employment as a student nurse for a hospital or a nurses’ training school by an individual who is enrolled and is regularly attending classes in an accredited nurses’ training school;

    (25) Employment as an intern for a hospital by an individual who has completed a four-year course in an accredited medical school;

    (26) Employment as an insurance salesperson, by other than a corporate officer, if all the wages from the employment is solely by way of commission. The word “insurance” includes an annuity and an optional annuity;

    (27) Employment as an officer of a township mutual insurance company or farmer’s mutual insurance company under chapter 67A;

    (28) Employment of a corporate officer, if the officer directly or indirectly, including through a subsidiary or holding company, owns 25 percent or more of the employer corporation, and employment of a member of a limited liability company, if the member directly or indirectly, including through a subsidiary or holding company, owns 25 percent or more of the employer limited liability company;

    (29) Employment as a real estate salesperson, other than a corporate officer, if all the wages from the employment is solely by way of commission;

    (30) Employment as a direct seller as defined in United States Code, title 26, section 3508;

    (31) Employment of an individual under the age of 18 in the delivery or distribution of newspapers or shopping news, not including delivery or distribution to any point for subsequent delivery or distribution;

    (32) Casual employment performed for an individual, other than domestic employment under clause (17), that does not promote or advance that employer’s trade or business;

    (33) Employment in “agricultural employment” unless it is “covered agricultural employment” under subdivision 11; or

    (34) If employment during one-half or more of any pay period was covered employment, all the employment for the pay period is covered employment; but if during more than one-half of any pay period the employment was noncovered employment, then all of the employment for the pay period is noncovered employment. “Pay period” means a period of not more than a calendar month for which a payment or compensation is ordinarily made to the employee by the employer.

    Denied Unemployment for Noncovered Jobs

    If you were denied unemployment because of a non-covered job, please reaching out for support.